Metoprolol and Bisoprolol in Coronary Artery Disease: An Observational Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

1Department of Pharmacy, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, INDIA

2Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, INDIA

3Department of Cardiology, SBKS Medical institute and Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, INDIA

Corresponding author.

Correspondence: Dr. Rajesh Hadia Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara-391760, Gujarat, MALAYSIA. Email: docrajesh.hadia@gmail.com
Received August 09, 2023; Revised September 10, 2023; Accepted October 15, 2023.
Copyright 2024 Authors
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Citation

1.Maheshwari RA, Rathi P, Shah J, Patel R, Mathew C, Rajput H, et al. Metoprolol and Bisoprolol in Coronary Artery Disease: An Observational Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Young Pharmacists [Internet]. 2024 Feb 15;16(1):42–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2024.16.6
Copy to clipboard
Published in: Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2024; 16(1): 42-49. Published online: 07 July 2025DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2024.16.6

ABSTRACT

Background: This observational, prospective cross-sectional study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of metoprolol and bisoprolol in the treatment of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients. Materials and Methods: The study received institutional ethics approval and was conducted at a tertiary care private teaching hospital over six months. Ninety CAD patients were included, with demographics and clinical characteristics recorded. Vital signs were measured at baseline, 48 hr, 7 days, and 1 month. Angina severity was assessed using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading Scale and New York Heart Association classification. Statistical analysis compared outcomes between metoprolol and bisoprolol groups. Results: Male patients (72.22%) received metoprolol more frequently, while bisoprolol was preferred among females (28.88%). Age had minimal influence on medication choice. Metoprolol-treated patients had higher Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) values (50.26%) compared to bisoprolol-treated patients (45.78%). Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities (RWMA) was similar between groups. Both medications effectively reduced hypertension severity and vital parameters, with significant reductions in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Heart Rate (HR) with metoprolol. The prevalence of chest pain decreased in both groups, with Class III patients achieving complete relief. Breathlessness symptoms improved overall, with some patients experiencing relief while others showed reduced symptoms. Side effects were low in both groups, but metoprolol had a slightly higher incidence. Conclusion: Metoprolol and bisoprolol demonstrated safety and efficacy in managing CAD patients. Metoprolol showed advantages in LVEF improvement and greater reduction in SBP, DBP, and HR, but it had a slightly higher side effect incidence. Both medications effectively alleviated chest pain and breathlessness symptoms. This study provides valuable insights into the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with metoprolol and bisoprolol in CAD patients, supporting their use in managing cardiac symptoms and hypertension

Keywords: Coronary artery disease, Metoprolol, Bisoprolol, Left ventricular ejection fraction, Hypertension